Chestia asta nu exista,nu vad de ce Orange ar investi intr-o tehnologie depasita.
DVB-H poate fi legat doar de DVB-T,fiind aceeasi tehnologie cu modulatie 4k sau 2k pentru o mai buna receptie in miscare http://www.dvb-h.org/PDF/DVB-H Speci...304.V1.1.1.pdf ceea ce Orange nu detine,deocamdata.
Transmisia se poate face pe emitatoare DVB-T,in paralel cu transmisia normala si ocupand mult mai putin din spectru fata de canalele normale,dar nu are legatura cu transmisiile pentru telefonia mobila.
Orange ar trebui sa investeasca intr-o retea separata,transmisia acestui standard nu se poate face pe retele existente,ar ocupa spectru mare si e ineficienta fiind de fapt transmisie MPEG2.In plus ar trebui sa achizitioneze alte frecvente si sa puna la dispozitie telefoane capabile sa receptioneze acest standard,foarte greu de gasit pe piata.
Pe Wikipedia se poate vedea ca aproape tot ce a fost updatat mai ales la 2010 si 2011 e de genul:
..but the service was closed in March 2012.....In the United States, Crown Castle had rolled out a DVB-H offering through a company they created called Modeo in 2006. It was initially offered in New York, but it was eventually terminated in 2007...In Estonia, DVB-H service started testing phase in April 2008 with Levira and EMT, offering up to 15 TV-stations. Testing period ended on November 2009; the service never went into commercial use.KPN announced it was terminating the DVB-H service on June 1, 2011 because of a lack of new mobiles supporting the standard which resulted in less users. KPN still believes in mobile video, but in the form of video-on-demand using mobile internet connections
Mai citam odata din wikipedia (nu ca ar fi o sursa suprema,dar aici spune bine cel care a scris):
Deci viitorul transmisiilor video e prin intermediul tehnologiei 4G,care foloseste acelasi spectru,aceeasi infrastructura si aceleasi terminale ca cele pentru voce/date (de fapt video e tot o transmisie de date).Frecventele din UIF realocate pentru GSM sunt destinate 4G,nu DVB-H.At the NAB show in April 2012, Peter Siebert of Europe's DVB Project Office said DVB-H did not succeed because so few devices were available, mainly because content producers would not subsidize them.[21]
The competing technologies - like MediaFLO in the US - did not have any success, new sales were terminated in December 2010 and the allocated spectrum sold to AT&T. These 1st generation transmissions protocols are not very spectrum efficient, but the fatal problem seems to be the lack of business model for mobile-TV. Very few have been willing to pay for the services. Even with a free mobile-tv signal, the daily use was often just a few minutes a day.
The Dutch KPN is an example. KPN quote lack of receiving devices, but even when KPN's service was initially free the average daily use was a mere 9 minutes pr phone having a DVB-H receiver. (TV is typically watched 2–3 hours per day)
The 4G/LTE which soon will be standard in all smartphones. 4G/LTE is already being used in many countries and will very likely be able to provide the needed capacity for mobile-TV within most peoples download maximum (Max GigaBytes).
4G/LTE has the potential of efficient multicast, which can increase the spectrum efficiency in broadcast type application to within a factor of maybe two compared to the newest (e.g DVB-T2/T2Lite) broadcast protocols.
Povestea asta e pornita de la faptul ca autorul unui articol a scis ca TV Mobile inseamna:
Ceea ce NU inseamna automat DVB-H!!Retelele radio celulare publice (tip Mobile TV) folosesc tehnologii precum DVB-H, LTE broadcast - multicast.
In concluzie "Orange a primit dreptul de a furniza servicii TV prin reteaua mobila proprie" nu are nici o treaba cu DVB-H!!!