Clarke-Tech ET9000 - noul lider din familia procesoarelor Broadcom

[motoru]

Au aparut deja primele impresii despre un nou aparut ce promite enorm.

Plusuri:
- cel mai rapid receptor E2 fabricat ever (512 MB DDR Memory !!!)
-7405 Broadcom chip : principala inbunatatire motion adaptative deinterlacing ceea ce promite un altgoritm mult inbunatatit de upscaling - probabil o imagine mai buna
- cccam serv/client evident
- deja PLI a scos primele imagini


Specificatii Clarke-Tech ET9000 Enigma 2 Twin Tuner:

Detail Information:

* 400MHz MIPS Processor
* HDTV H.264 Hardware
* Twin Tuner SAT
* Linux Enigma 2 OSD System
* 10/100MBit Ethernet LAN
* Grafic 12 characters VFD Front Display
* 3 x USB 2.0 conenctions, externe HDD, Keyboard, Mouse, Hub, DVD
* 1 x Sata internal for HDD
* 1 x eSata external
* 1 x HDMI
* 1 x YUV
* 2 x Common Interface Slots
* 2 x Cardreaders inside
* Multimedia Video/Audio Streaming over the network
* S/PDIF Dolby Digital AC3
* 2 Scart (RGB, FBAS or S-Video)
* RS232
* 8MB Separate boot memory
* 128MB Flash / 512 MB DDR Memory
* DiseqC 1.0/1.1/1.2/1.3 USALS
* Media Player
* Direct Plugin Download


Un filmulet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcSoKr2RUlE


am vazut pe net si ceva poze, este dragut si ordonat la interior cu suport de HDD iar pretul in jur de 500 EURO.

Daca va beneficia de suport probabil o sa auzim multe lucruri bune despre el si poate fi o sperietoare pt VU si DMM

[MihaiP]

Cred ca tu poti cel mai bine sa ne spui la ce va folosi cei 512Mb de RAM ! eu cred ca si cei 256Mb de la VU+Duo
erau suficienti ...desi recunosc ca inafara unui test sumar nu prea m-am intalnit cu acesta din urma. Cred ca ar
putea avea nevoie de mai mult RAM doar daca ar aparea facilitati de exploatare paralela a celor doua tunnere
inca neimplementate ...hmmm ...cine stie ?

[motoru]

VU+duo foloseste toata memoria din dotare plus swap, din punctul meu de vedere cei 512 mb sunt bineveniti si vor fi utilizati. Citeam pe undeva ca plusul de viteza socheaza, ceva de genul dm800>>>VU.

Eu voi fi cu ochii pe acest receptor minusul fiind lipsa unuor sloturi de tuner plug&play unde noul DM 7020HD exceleza.

[stonewell]

salutare,

l-am bagat si noi,

http://www.satmultimedia.ro/Receiver...-Receiver.html

l-am si comandat pentru teste sa vedem ce stie...revin cu informatii pretioase..!

Surf Placut!

[techcenter]

foarte interesante specificatiile acestui receptor. sa inteleg ca "s-a nascut" vu+ duo killer-ul? (asta ca sa citez un clasic, inca in viata ). ma preageam sa dicut cu mosu' sa-mi aduca un vu+duo ca am fost cu minte (nu, n-am scris gresit; cuminte, n-am fost), si m-am oprit "din negocieri. credeti ca-i vazu' sa mai astept?

succesuri!

[yuli]

Clarke-Tech ET9000 Dreambox 800 SE Dreambox DM8000 VU+ Duo

Prozessor: Broadcom 7405 400MHz Mips Broadcom 7405 400MHz Mips Broadcom 7400 400MHz Mips Broadcom 7335 400MHz Mips
Betriebssystem: Enigma 2 Enigma 2 Enigma 2 Enigma 2
Speicher: 512MB RAM 256 MB RAM 256MB RAM 384MB RAM
Dual Videoencoder/ Ja Ja,jedoch Ja NEIN
Bild in Bild: Biede Tuner nur auf gleichen TP Biede Tuner NEIN
Bootzeit: 55-65 sec 75-85 sec 180-210 sec 70-80 sec
Tuner/ Twin Tuner SAT Einfachstecktuner Twin Tuner SAT + 2 Slots Twin Tuner SAT
Durchschleifmoglichkeit: JA NEIN NEIN NEIN
Kuhlung: Passivkuhlung/lautlos Lufterkuhlung Passivkuhlung/Lufter optional Lufterkuhlung
Fernbedienung: Universal (SAT/TV/DVD/AUX) Universal (SAT/TV) Universal (SAT/TV) Keine Universal
Common Interface: 2 Keines 4 2
Smartcard Reader: 2 2 2 2
USB 2.0: 2+1 2 2+1 2+1
HDMI-Schnittstelle: JA JA NEIN / DVI-Ausgang JA
WLAN: JA - Optional USB-Stick JA - Optional USB-Stick JA - Eingebaut JA - Optional USB-Stick

---------- Post added at 17:12 ---------- Previous post was at 17:08 ----------

http://sat.lali-net.si/index.php?opt...1085&Itemid=26

---------- Post added at 17:32 ---------- Previous post was at 17:12 ----------

Clarke Tech ET-9000 Flashing Image using USB Pen Drive.

1. Unzip compressed file.
2. Copy the "ET9000" folder to a USB Pen Drive.
3. Power off receiver with the mains switch on the rear.
4. Connect USB Pen Drive.
5. Power on receiver with the mains switch on the rear.
6. Press the OK Button on the front panel (behind the front flap).

Update in progress.

The receiver will reboot automatically after update

[cristo4]

Deci a testat cineva pana acum? Cum se misca, cum merge cccam-ul? e stabil? Calitatea tunerelor? Calitatea video a imaginii? Ecm-time pe readerele interne?
Din specificatii arata foarte bine....dar pt a supravietui trebuie sa aiba suport soft,altfel e inca un reciever foarte bun pe hardware...si cam atat.
Astept review-uri mai ales de la staff-ul satmultimedia.ro!

[yuli]

salutare,

l-am bagat si noi,

http://www.satmultimedia.ro/Receiver...-Receiver.html

l-am si comandat pentru teste sa vedem ce stie...revin cu informatii pretioase..!

Surf Placut!

Il rugam pe maestru stonewell sa ne spuna primele impresii !!! CCCAM , VIDEO HDMI ,STABILITATE , ZAPPING ..ETC .

[motoru]

Maestre stonewell, vine jucaria sau este inzapezita pe undeva ?

Dupa cum ziceam in titlul topicului sunt curios pe testate si pipaite daca intradevar Clarke-Tech ET9000 este noul lider cum am citit pe ici pe colo !


Actualul lider (din punctul meu de vedere subiectiv poate) este evident VU+duo.

[yuli]

Pana sa avem un betatester si pe la noi , iata cateva comentarii in engleza de la cineva care l-a testat :

I am tested this box now for a week:

Streaming -> ok
Cccam -> ok
Picture on flatscreen better than my old CT5000 HD+
Till now i am very pleased with this box

Others test reports:

1:
OK guys, I would say the new driver fixes the issue. My test recoring is now already at approx 7GB, which is way more than I ever had before. I will let it run for some additional time, and then I will do some more tests (parallel recordings, switching channels while recording), but I think it's fixed.

On one hand, I find it totally unacceptable that the box was launched with such a major and obvious bug. On the other hand I am quite delighted that CT provided a fix so fast, having in mind that it's only 1 day ago that I reported this issue for the very first time. This is impressive and makes me believe that future bugs that need to be fixed in the drivers will be quickly adressed as well.

2:
Wow OD! This sounds good. I will switch this evening to 2.0 as well with the new driver. CT is very quick compared with other stb producer. They submitted the informations about the remotecontrol to the Logitech Harmony database very fast. 3 days after my request the database entry was done from Logitech.

1080p
Quote:

Doesn't work yet. I would not really consider this as a bug, because the box is not being advertised to be able to output 1080p content. However, Dreamboxes and VU+ can do it, and on both it was implemented during development. I'm quite sure that technically the box is able to output 1080p as well, it's just not yet implemented in the drivers.

When I enable the 3 1080p resolutions in AR plugin and play back a 1080p file, the actual output resolution changes to 576i even though the info window of AR plugin states the intended 1080p resolution.

The output of 1080p content with 1080i works fine. All media files I tested so far work fine, including DTS audio. Navigating within media files work WAY better than on the VU+. On the VU+, when I played 1080p files with DTS audio, the playback itself was ok, but fast-forwarding, rewinding, skipping or changing audio track where often choppy or even caused the box to hang. On the ET9000 I could not observe any such issues so far. So I'd say once they implemented 1080p support, this is also a great media player.

[yuli]

Pareri de pe alte forumuri :

Eu am si dream 8000 si clarke ET9000 ,si surprinderea mea a fost ca clarke este peste dream,viteza,menu etc.

La noi nu testeaza nimeni ?

[vicu432]

Si eu am dream 8000 si clarke ET 9000,diferenta e ca clarke e peste dream 8000,viteza,mai usor de manevrat etc.

[me1960]

Salut, te rugam frumos , sa aduci detalii suplimentare legate de cele doua receptoare .... comparativ .
Multumim frumos .

[vicu432]

Comparatia Clarke-Drea

[yuli]

vicu daca poti sa faci o comparatie intre calitatea video hdmi intre clarke-tech si dream .
din cate am citit clarke ar trebui sa fie superior datorita up-scalarii !
ms.