Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: TRIAX design

  1. #16
    RSP - TEAM horatyu's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Aug 2007
    Location
    SIBIU
    Posts
    5,787
    Mentioned
    67 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    135

    Default

    castiga rigiditate daca e construita sub un alt unghi partea de jos a antenei , nu pierde
    LA TOTI NI-I GREU, DAR NU LA FEL
    "SGU Stargate Universe"

  2. #17
    Standard RSP member
    Join Date
    10 Dec 2010
    Location
    la tara
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    56

    Default

    Rigiditatea unui paraboloid in sine este destul de buna, eventual se poate intari cu un sistem de nervuri, dar nu asta e problema. Nu vad de ce ar fi nevoie de "crestaea" buzei, acel brat trebuie sa suporte o sarcina mecanica relativ mica, sustinerea prin exteriorul reflectorui chiar nu e o problema tehnica deosebita.

    @horatyu
    Da, mi-ar place sa vad acel studiu...
    T85 (12.5W-5/4-1W-5E-13E-19E-23.5E); 1,2m Fe (actuator); DM500, TT3600; Focus

  3. #18
    Standard RSP member
    Join Date
    18 Mar 2010
    Location
    software< -&->hardware
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    @Luke_ms
    portiunea ( aceea in care se afla bratul ) respectiva nu intra in suprafata utila, care reflecta spre ghidul de unda al lnb/lnc.
    suprafata utila nu merge chiar pina in margine, deoarece margine se poate indoi, poate vibra de la vant/furtuna.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •