F11 , ce FRUMOASA E TEREORIA/CE SCRIE PE HARTIE , PRACTICA INSA.........
Eu sunt convins ca multi sau GANDIT INAINTEA TA sa faca ce ai scris tu , dar de la TEORIE LA PRACTICA e distanta mare
Si la fel de convins sunt ca cei care AU AVUT INITIATIVA nu au fost puturosi , dar din varii motive nu au putut sa PUNA IN PRACTICA cea ce ai scris tu
TEORETIC ROMANUL SE PRICEPE LA TOATE , PRACTIC INSA......
Poti sa-mi explici unde este asa de mare diferenta intre teorie si practica???
Diferenta o face LENEA si NEPASAREA in rest nu este nevoie decit de o lopata si o roaba ceva pietrisi si cativa saci de ciment.
f11
F11 , te credeam mai ''destept'' , insa...... sa-le luam pe rand :
Nu ai curent electric=> Hmm este o problema dar foarte putine localitati nu sun bransate - Cum pana mea TE POTI CONECTA SINGUR LA MAGISTRALA DACA NU AI CELE NECESATE ( autorizatii , stalpi , cabluri s.a.m.d )
Nu ai apa curenta => sapi o fantana + hidrofor si catva metrii de teava - ai rezolvat problema mai ieftin decat o racordare clasica - Nu peste tot exista acelas tip de teren/pamant si unde ai ''norocul'' sa nu gasesti ''panza freatica'' ce faci ?
Nu ai canalizate => sapi o gaura, faci o fosa septica - ai rezolvat problema mai ieftin decat o racordare clasica - Era vorba de retea de canalizare pt apa curenta si nu ''scurgerea'' apei curente
AI latrina => faci si tu o baie normala care o racordezi la puncul 1 si puncul 2 - ai rezolvat problema asta oricum o faci - Alti nu au reusit sa isi construiasca o magazie mai de doamne ajuta pt lemne si tu vorbesti/scrii de ''lucruri sfinte''
Insa ai uitat/omis ce era mai important - Toti acei oameni care au ''lipsurile'' din articolul in cauza NU DISPUN DE PUTEREA FINANCIARA , acest lucru fiind SPECIFICAT SI IN ARTICOL , dar cum se citeste/intelege DOAR PRINTRE RANDURI.......
- Asa ca as vrea eu sa te vad pe tine cand nu ai banii necesari , cate lipsuri din articolul in cauza poti rezolva ?
Si nu pe hartie/in scris ci PRACTIC , acel articol mai mult ca sigur facand referire la vreo zona defavorizata
Ca eu am scris ca unele dintre lipsurile din articol se gasesc in si in zone care nu sunt defavorizate e altceva si nu putem generaliza pt toata tara
Cei de la Forbes au alta parere:Quote:
Originally Posted by zildan [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
”Romania Slashes Taxes, Speedy Growth Ensues
Another country that “gets it” is Romania, the mountainous, European nation and home to roughly 20 million people. After years of tepid growth, Romania’s government moved to revise its tax code. At the end of last year, it reduced the value added tax (VAT) rate from 24 percent to 20 percent, lowered the income withholding tax rate, nixed a controversial “special construction” tax, simplified deductibles and exempted certain dividends from corporate income tax.
The changes have worked much faster than expected.
In the first quarter, Romania grew 4.3 percent year-over-year, beating the 3.9 percent analysts had expected, and up 1.6 percent from the fourth quarter of 2015. This places the country among the fastest growing EU economies, with the European Commission now expecting it to be the second fastest growing country in the 28-member bloc, behind only Ireland.
What’s more, investment bank Wood & Company sees country GDP growing 5.1 percent this year and 5.8 in 2017. Much of this growth, Wood writes, will be driven not just by tax cuts but also low borrowing costs, restructured balance sheets and loose fiscal policy. Private consumption is healthy and investor confidence is up.
The country is also getting back to work. Romania’s unemployment rate in May fell to 6.6 percent, compared to 10.1 percent on average for eurozone countries. Its youth unemployment rate, while worrisome at 21 percent, still significantly trails levels found in several other EU countries, including Italy (36.9 percent), Spain (43.9 percent) and Greece (47.4 percent).”
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]